—– Original Message —–

From: HRW ECA

To: HRW ECA

Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2008 4:32 AM

Subject: Uzbekistan: Activists Released Before EU Meeting

For Immediate Release

Uzbekistan: Activists Released Before EU Meeting

EU Should Sustain Pressure on Tashkent to Release Other Imprisoned Activists

(New York, February 5, 2008) – The Uzbek government’s recent release of five individuals imprisoned for human rights work shows that sustained international pressure on Tashkent is effective, Human Rights Watch said today. The releases occurred in the days preceding an important bilateral EU-Uzbekistan meeting in Tashkent on February 5.

The five activists released or amnestied between February 2-4 are Umida Niazova, Saidjahon Zainabitdinov, Dilmurod Muhitdinov, Ikhtior Khamraev, and Bahodir Mukhtarov. Niazova was serving a suspended prison sentence after her seven-year prison term was commuted in May 2007 (http://hrw.org/ english/docs/ 2007/05/08/ uzbeki15881. htm).

We are overjoyed that these courageous men and women are finally free, but more than a dozen other activists remain in prison simply because of their peaceful human rights work and criticism of the government,” said Holly Cartner, Europe and Central Asia director at Human Rights Watch. “The EU needs to keep up pressure on Tashkent to release all imprisoned human rights activists.”

Uzbekistan’s release and effective amnesty of imprisoned human rights defenders is among the criteria that the European Union has set for reviewing the sanctions it imposed on Tashkent more than two years ago. The next review of the sanctions is scheduled for late April.

The European Union initially imposed sanctions against Uzbekistan in October 2005, in response to the May 2005 Andijan massacre, in which Uzbek security forces killed hundreds of mostly unarmed protesters, and during the Uzbek government’s ensuing crackdown on civil society.

During its last review, the European Union in October 2007 extended sanctions against Uzbekistan for an additional 12 months. At the same time, however, it temporarily suspended for six months the bulk of the sanctions regime, including a visa ban on eight Uzbek government officials, as a gesture to the Uzbek government.

Nevertheless, the European Union also stressed that sanctions would be automatically reinstated unless Uzbekistan fulfilled the EU’s conditions, which include releasing human rights defenders from detention and ceasing their harassment. Other criteria for Uzbekistan include allowing access by relevant international bodies to prisoners, engaging effectively with the UN special rapporteurs on human rights, and allowing all nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) – including Human Rights Watch – to operate without constraints in Uzbekistan.

EU member states are split as to whether to maintain sanctions against Uzbekistan, and countries like Germany and Spain have claimed that the sanctions have not proven effective and should therefore be dropped altogether. Fortunately, however, a group of EU members including the Netherlands, Ireland, Denmark, Sweden and the United Kingdom have taken a principled position that the sanctions should be extended further until the Uzbek government had met the EU’s clearly stated benchmarks for easing sanctions. To do otherwise, these countries argued, would be to squander the EU’s leverage and undermine its credibility in other human rights crises.

Human Rights Watch stressed that the release and amnesty of a number of human rights defenders proves that a principled stand by the EU can affect human rights positively, even in countries like Uzbekistan.

The release of these five activists is clearly the result of EU pressure,” said Cartner. “Tashkent has finally understood that it needs to make real concessions for the sanctions to be removed. The EU must now act responsibly to ensure that it maintains pressure until all its criteria are met.”

Human Rights Watch called on the European Union to continue to use its leverage with the Uzbek government and not falter in pressing strongly for the release of all remaining human rights defenders in custody, including:

Mutabar Tojibaeva;

Azam Formonov;

Alisher Karamatov;

Jamshid Karimov;

Norboi Kholjigitov;

Habibulla Okpulatov;

Mamarajab Nazarov;

Nosim Isakov;

Ulugbek Kattabekov;

Abdusattor Irzaev;

Rasul Khudainasarov;

Bobomurod Mavlanov; and

Gulbahor Turaeva (currently serving a six-year suspended sentence at home; see http://www.hrw. org/english/ docs/2007/ 05/10/uzbeki1589 9.htm).

Human Rights Watch remains very concerned about the well-being of the recently released activists. Uzbekistan’s defenders who have been fortunate enough to avoid imprisonment continue to operate under extreme conditions of government repression, exposing themselves and their families to constant threats and harassment. In the last six months alone, several defenders have had to flee the country, indicating that the crackdown against the human rights community continues.

Focusing on getting imprisoned defenders released should remain an absolute priority for the EU in its dealings with Tashkent,” said Cartner. “But ensuring their safety and ability to pursue their work unhindered is equally important, and this is a key part of the sanctions criteria.”

Ikhtior Khamraev was released on February 3, 2008. He is the son of Bakhtior Khamraev, a well-known human rights defender from Jizzakh and chair of the Jizzakh province branch of the Human Rights Society of Uzbekistan (OPCHU). Ikhtior Khamraev was arrested on August 2, 2006 and on September 25, 2006 was sentenced to three years’ imprisonment for alleged hooliganism. Many, including Human Rights Watch, believe Ikhtior Khamraev’s imprisonment is retribution for his father’s human rights work.

Bahodir Mukhtarov was released on February 4, 2008. He is the eldest son of Mamatkul Mukhtarov, head of the Samarkand branch of OPCHU. Bahodir Mukhtarov was arrested on February 15, 2007 and in June 2007 was sentenced to one year imprisonment. Many organizations believe Bahodir Mukhtarov was arrested and imprisoned because of his father’s human rights work as well.

Saidjahon Zainabitdinov was released on February 2, 2008. He is a long-term human rights defender and chair of the human rights group Appeliatsia (Appeal) who witnessed the massacre at Andijan on May 13, 2005. In the days following the massacre, Zainabitdinov gave dozens of interviews to the press and international community about the uprising and protest in his city, speaking out forcefully against the indiscriminate shooting of unarmed protesters by Uzbek forces.

On May 21, 2005, Uzbek authorities arrested Zainabitdinov and accused him of publishing bulletins that “were intended to sow panic among the population” and undermine Uzbekistan’s public image. In a closed trial, he was sentenced to seven years of imprisonment on charges of slander, undermining the constitutional order, and membership in an illegal religious organization.

Dilmurod Muhiddinov was released on February 3, 2008. He is an active member of the human rights organization Ezgulik and of the opposition political party, Birlik. Police arrested Mukhiddinov in his home in Markhamat district, Andijan province on May 20, 2005, and accused him (and five others involved with the party) of distributing a Birlik statement condemning the Andijan massacre. Of the six who stood trial, Mukhiddinov was the only one who was not released on a suspended sentence on January 12, 2006. Instead, he was sentenced to five years of imprisonment.

Umida Niazova was amnestied on February 3, 2008. She is a human rights defender and independent journalist who regularly contributed to Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty and other new agencies. From 2005 to 2006, she worked as a translator for Human Rights Watch’s representative office in Uzbekistan. Previously, she had worked with such international NGOs as Freedom House and Internews.

On January 22, 2007, Niazova was arrested by the Uzbek authorities as she was returning to Tashkent from Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan. She was held incommunicado for four days, and faced politically motivated charges of smuggling and illegally crossing the border. She was sentenced to seven years of imprisonment on May 1, 2007. Niazova’s prison term was later commuted to a seven-year suspended sentence. Under the terms of her suspended sentence, Niazova had been obliged to report regularly to the neighborhood police, notify the authorities about any changes in her profession, and observe a 10:00 p.m. curfew.

Background

The government of Uzbekistan is one of the most repressive to have emerged from the break-up of the Soviet Union. For many years it has fostered a hostile and dangerous environment for the work of human rights defenders and others in civil society. In the two years following the May 13, 2005 massacre in Andijan, the Uzbekistan government unleashed a fierce crackdown on human rights defenders, independent journalists, and NGO and political activists. More than two dozen human rights defenders have had criminal charges brought against them.

The European Union first imposed sanctions on Uzbekistan in October 2005, in response to Tashkent’s refusal to agree to an international commission of inquiry into the May 2005 Andijan massacre, as well as the unprecedented levels of crackdown on civil society perpetrated by the government in the months following the massacre. The sanctions were composed of a visa ban on 12 Uzbek officials the European Union considered “directly responsible for the indiscriminate and disproportionate use of force in Andijan,” an arms embargo, and partial suspension of the Partnership and Cooperation Agreement (PCA), the framework that regulates the European Union’s relationship with Uzbekistan. This marked the first time in the EU’s history that it suspended a PCA with another country over human rights concerns.

Over the last two years, the European Union has incrementally weakened the sanctions despite persistent defiance by the Uzbek government to heed EU human rights demands. First, the partial suspension of the PCA was lifted in November 2006. The sanctions were again weakened in May 2007 when the names of four officials were taken off the visa ban list. In October 2007, the visa ban was suspended for six months, but will automatically be reinstated unless there is a consensus to continue suspension or lift the ban altogether.

To view a Human Rights Watch campaign page with additional background on human rights defenders in Uzbekistan, please visit:

http://www.hrw. org/campaigns/ uzbekistan/ portraits06/ index.htm

For more of Human Rights Watch’s work on Uzbekistan, please visit:

http://hrw.org/ doc?t=europe&c=uzbeki

For more information, please contact:

In Bishkek, Andrea Berg (English, German, Russian): +996-312-665575; or +996-555-515345 (mobile)

In Moscow, Allison Gill (English, Russian): +7-495-737-8955; or +7-916-238-5127 (mobile)

In New York, Holly Cartner (English): +1-212-216-1288; or +1-917-293-3090 (mobile)

In The Hague, Veronika Szente-Goldston (English, Finnish, Swedish, Hungarian, French): +31-70-392 6700; or +1-917-582-1271 (mobile)

  30 Responses to “Activists Released Before EU Meeting.”

  1. I dont much like your template on the other hand posts are quite great so I will look! Also i cant sign up for your feed! Any ideea why?

  2. naturally like your web-site but you have to take a look at the spelling on quite a few of your posts. Many of them are rife with spelling issues and I to find it very troublesome to tell the reality on the other hand I’ll certainly come again again.

  3. I’ve said that least 4367911 times. The problem this like that is they are just too compilcated for the average bird, if you know what I mean

  4. tb4367911@4367911…

    I’ve said that least 4367911 times….

  5. Thanks for your personal marvelous posting! I actually enjoyed reading it, you can be a great author.I will make certain to bookmark your blog and will eventually come back sometime soon. I want to encourage yourself to continue your great posts, have a nice weekend!

  6. My spouse and i were now satisfied Michael could finish off his preliminary research while using the ideas he grabbed from your own blog. It is now and again perplexing to simply always be giving for free strategies which often some other people might have been trying to sell. And now we see we now have the writer to appreciate for that. The main illustrations you’ve made, the simple web site navigation, the relationships you will give support to promote – it is mostly overwhelming, and it’s helping our son in addition to the family know that this theme is satisfying, and that’s very serious. Many thanks for the whole lot!

  7. I appreciate the insightful post. Thanks.

  8. I appreciate you for this impressive report. I’m refreshed following perusing this. Thank you so much!

  9. I precisely needed to say thanks all over again. I am not sure the things I might have worked on in the absence of the type of techniques discussed by you over such a area of interest. Previously it was the distressing issue in my opinion, however , finding out the specialized approach you resolved it took me to jump over fulfillment. I am grateful for this information as well as believe you realize what an amazing job your are undertaking instructing some other people through your blog. I am sure you’ve never come across all of us.

  10. It’s a great post. Thanks and continue sharing.

  11. Nice site. On your blogs very interest and i will tell a pals.

  12. Oh my goodness! an amazing article dude. Thank you Nevertheless I am experiencing problem with ur rss . Don’t know why Unable to subscribe to it. Is there anybody getting an identical rss problem? Anybody who is aware of kindly respond. Thnkx

  13. An individual’s package deal choice would depend the actual things to do you might want to are involved in.

  14. Howdy. I was thinking of adding a backlink back to your website since both of our sites are based mostly around the same subject. Would you prefer I link to you using your site address: http://en.hrsu.org/archives/167 or blog title: Activists Released Before EU Meeting. » Human Rights Society of Uzbekistan. Please let me know at your earliest convenience. Kudos

  15. Hey – nice weblog, just wanting round some blogs, seems a reasonably good platform You Are using. I’m at the moment utilizing Drupal for a few of my websites however seeking to change considered one of them over to a platform very much the identical to yours as a trial run. Anything in particular you’ll suggest about it?

  16. Hi there! I just wanted to ask if you ever have any trouble with hackers? My last blog (wordpress) was hacked and I ended up losing many months of hard work due to no backup. Do you have any methods to prevent hackers?

  17. Uhhhg, I spent an hour trying to get this right. Thanks again!

  18. Thank you for supplementary great blog. Where else could i accumulate this compassionate of info written in such an incite full way? i have been looking for such information.

  19. My spouse and I stumbled over here by a different web page and thought I may as well check things out. I like what I see so now i am following you. Look forward to looking at your web page again.

  20. your blog is so nice, i like it,thank you!

  21. Hello! I just wish to give a huge thumbs up for the excellent information you’ve gotten correct here on this post. I will likely be coming back to your blog for more soon.

  22. Good – I should certainly pronounce, impressed with your web site. I had no trouble navigating through all the tabs and related information ended up being truly easy to do to access. I recently found what I hoped for before you know it at all. Quite unusual. Is likely to appreciate it for those who add forums or something, website theme . a tones way for your customer to communicate. Excellent task.

  23. Nice read, I just passed this onto a friend who was doing some research on that. And he actually bought me lunch because I found it for him smile So let me rephrase that: Thank you for lunch!

  24. A person essentially lend a hand to make significantly articles I would state. That is the first time I frequented your web page and thus far? I amazed with the research you made to create this actual put up extraordinary. Excellent activity!

  25. magnificent issues altogether, you just gained a new reader. What could you suggest in regards to your publish that you made some days ago? Any certain?

  26. Good Games…

    [...]why not create a new free and enjoyable online video games web site and start enjoying the games that you’re concerned with probably the most awesome.[...]…

  27. Fun Games…

    [...]can play them directly on most browsers. Most of these free online games use Flash which is a vector-based software program developed by Adobe.[...]…

  28. The new Zune browser is surprisingly good, but not as good as the iPod’s. It works well, but isn’t as fast as Safari, and has a clunkier interface. If you occasionally plan on using the web browser that’s not an issue, but if you’re planning to browse the web alot from your PMP then the iPod’s larger screen and better browser may be important.

  29. Good Games…

    [...]why not create a new free and enjoyable online games site and begin enjoying the games that you’re all for essentially the most awesome.[...]…

  30. laptop repairs luton…

    [...]Here is a good Weblog You may Find Intriguing that we Encourage You[...]…

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

   
© 2011 Human Rights Society of Uzbekistan Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha